中文

Service

Property Development Feasibility, Done the Way an Owner Would

Before you commit capital to a site in Adelaide, you need to know whether the numbers actually work. Cyberate PM produces data-driven feasibility analysis for landowners, investors and project owners across South Australia — testing site potential against the Planning & Design Code, building a transparent cost stack, and pressure-testing residual land value and development margin so you can make a decision you can defend.

The three-way test · Approvable · Buildable · Bankable

Overview

Numbers first. Drawings second.

A feasibility study is the single most important document in the life of a development — it decides whether a project should proceed at all, and on what terms. As a client-side development management and advisory firm, Cyberate PM's feasibility fee comes from you alone — whether the answer is build, hold or walk away — so our only job is to tell you the truth about the numbers. We combine deep South Australian planning knowledge with a data-driven approach and our SAFE model, so the feasibility you rely on reflects real PlanSA pathways, real costs, and real market evidence — not optimism. One study, three verdicts: approvable under the Code, buildable for the market, bankable on the numbers.

  1. 01Brief & Site Intake
  2. 02Planning & Yield Assessment
  3. 03Cost & Revenue Modelling
  4. 04Risk & Sensitivity Analysis
  5. 05Report & Advisory Review

Scout™ · Register-Scale Analysis

We read the register before anyone draws a plan.

Feasibility starts with evidence, not instinct. Around any site we analyse the development applications on the public register — what was proposed, how close it sits, and how each application was assessed — the same register-scale method behind our award-winning research on 20,000+ South Australian planning consents. It shows what the area actually approves, before a design dollar is spent.

Planning development feasibility · automated big-data analysis
One site, read against the register around it. Illustrative pattern — a synthetic suburb and generated applications, not live planning data.
  • Land division
  • Multi-dwelling
  • Detached
  • Other applications
  • In assessment

The panel below runs on a generated pattern and says so on its face — the suburb, application numbers and every figure are synthetic. In production the analysis reads real register data, and report outputs state their sources.

What we manage

Six questions the file must answer

These are the questions the file has to answer before anyone commissions a scheme. If a line cannot be answered, that is already a finding.

  1. 01

    Site & Planning Analysis

    We map what the site can actually deliver under the Planning & Design Code — zone, overlays, setbacks, height, site coverage and likely yield — and identify the realistic PlanSA assessment pathway (deemed-to-satisfy, performance assessed, or SCAP referral) before any number is modelled.

  2. 02

    Development Cost Stack

    A line-by-line cost stack covering land, professional fees, construction, holding and finance costs, statutory contributions, headworks and contingency — built from current South Australian inputs rather than rules of thumb, so nothing material is left off the page.

  3. 03

    Residual Land Value & Margin

    We model gross realisation against the full cost stack to derive residual land value and development margin (on cost and on revenue), so you can see exactly what the land is worth to a project and whether the margin justifies the risk.

  4. 04

    Revenue & Market Evidence

    End values are grounded in comparable sales, absorption rates and current demand evidence for the specific suburb and product type — not a single optimistic per-square-metre figure applied across the whole project.

  5. 05

    Risk & Sensitivity Testing

    We stress-test the result against the variables that actually move outcomes — construction cost escalation, interest rates, sales prices and programme delays — so you understand how much room the project has before the margin disappears.

  6. 06

    Decision-Ready Recommendation

    You receive a clear, evidence-based view on whether to proceed, renegotiate the land price, change the scheme, or walk away — written in plain language for owners and investors, with the assumptions transparent and auditable.

How we deliver

From intake to a decision you can defend

The sequence is deliberately slow at the front. Speed at the start is how sites become drawings that cannot be built, financed, or sold.

  1. 01 · Brief & Site Intake

    We start with your objectives and the site — title details, zoning, contract terms and any concept you already have — and agree the scope and assumptions the feasibility will be built on.

  2. 02 · Planning & Yield Assessment

    We test the site against the Planning & Design Code and PlanSA pathways to establish a realistic, achievable development envelope and yield — the foundation every number depends on.

  3. 03 · Cost & Revenue Modelling

    We build the full cost stack and ground the revenue side in current market evidence, producing residual land value and margin under a base case.

  4. 04 · Risk & Sensitivity Analysis

    We run sensitivities across cost, price, finance and timing to show how robust the result is and where the project is most exposed.

  5. 05 · Report & Advisory Review

    We deliver the feasibility and walk you through it as your client-side adviser — what it means for your decision, and the next steps if you choose to proceed.

Yield™ · Investment Verdict

The whole project, priced before you commit.

The second half of a feasibility is arithmetic with consequences. Our model prices the whole development — acquisition, statutory charges, construction, finance and sales — line by line at current South Australian fees and charges, then states the verdict the way a lender wants it: net profit, margin on cost, and what happens to each when the sale price moves ±8%. Every line carries its rate and its quantity, so the number can be questioned — which is the point.

Project feasibility · the whole development priced line by line
A condensed extract of the 40+ line-item model. Illustrative pattern — every figure is generated and rounded; not a quote, valuation or current fee schedule.
  • Acquisition
  • Statutory
  • Construction
  • Finance & holding
  • Sales

The panel below runs on generated figures and says so on its face — every dollar amount is synthetic and rounded. In production the model runs 40+ line items on current South Australian fees, charges and verified market evidence, and reports disclose their sources and confidence.

Why Cyberate PM

A Development Manager That Knows SA

  1. 01

    Client-side only. We act solely for you — not for a builder, surveyor or selling agent — so the feasibility serves your interests, with no incentive to make a marginal project look better than it is.

  2. 02

    Data-driven, not rule-of-thumb. Our approach is built on current South Australian cost, planning and market data, supported by our sister company's Scout, Shield and Yield tools, rather than recycled assumptions.

  3. 03

    Genuine SA planning fluency. We work in the language of the PDI Act 2016, the Planning & Design Code, PlanSA, SCAP, Land Services SA and SA Water — so the assessment pathway and statutory costs are right from the start.

  4. 04

    Powered by the SAFE model. Feasibility is the Strategy & Planning (S) stage of our SAFE model, so the analysis connects directly to how a project would later be approved, financed and delivered — not a one-off document in isolation.

  5. 05

    Owner's Mindset. We interrogate every assumption as if the capital at risk were our own, because the cost of a flawed feasibility is borne entirely by you.

Related guides→ Feasibility Report Packages→ Subdivision & Land Division→ The SAFE Model→ Architecture & engineering design studio→ Guide: making the investment call

Case 01 · Southern suburbs · 5 townhouses · Planning consent granted

Five townhouses on a parcel sliced apart by protected trees and an easement

The constraint. Several regulated mature trees, each with a statutory protection zone, and a service easement crossing the site with tight limits on building over it — two layers of statutory constraint slicing the workable land into fragments.

What CPM did. The critical information on sites like this usually arrives piecemeal, and the design gets redrawn each time. CPM assembled every exclusion onto one plan before concept design began, so the design team worked on the true developable land from day one — the masterplan was organised around the constraints once, not revised towards them.

All five townhouses approved, with no compromise to how each home lives.

Talk to us about your site →

Further Reading

How we think about this work

A feasibility rarely fails on arithmetic — it fails when a key input was a guess wearing a decimal point. These three set out which numbers to interrogate, why we mark unverified rows as unverified instead of rounding them up to a yes, and how market evidence should be read at the margin.

The Numbers to Question in Any Feasibility Model
Feasibility

The Numbers to Question in Any Feasibility Model

A feasibility model rarely fails on arithmetic. It fails when a key input was a guess. How to interrogate the yield, build rate, duration and contingency.

Read the article →
"Unverified" Is an Answer: Three-State Compliance Explained
Feasibility & Strategy

"Unverified" Is an Answer: Three-State Compliance Explained

Pass-or-fail tables can claim more than anyone checked. Three-state compliance names the third state — unverified — and never shows doubt as a pass.

Read the article →
What's Another Square Metre Worth? Marginal Value vs Average Price
Land Strategy

What's Another Square Metre Worth? Marginal Value vs Average Price

Median prices answer almost nothing a developer needs. The real question is marginal: what the market pays for another square metre, and over what range.

Read the article →

The Evidence Base

What we know about approval timing comes from 20,000+ real applications

Cyberate PM contributed to Chapter 2 of RESI’s Australia Housing Market White Paper, which analysed more than 20,000 planning consent applications to identify what actually decides how long an approval takes. It is the same evidence we manage your application against.

20,000+

SA planning consent applications analysed

Residential subdivision consent applications lodged through PlanSA between January 2022 and June 2025.

18

Adelaide metropolitan councils covered

Proportionally sampled across all 18 metropolitan councils, so council-level variation is measurable.

6–12 mths

Typical land division, lodgement to new titles

The council decision itself takes only 30–60 business days of that; conditions, works and title clearances take the rest. Sequenced in parallel, a division lands at the short end. Range per Land Services SA and SA industry guidance.

See the findings and charts →

Source: Australian Residential Construction Institute (RESI), Australia Housing Market White Paper 2026. Chapter 2 draws on original research by Percy Zhang, Dr Ruidong Chang, Dr Joy Fang, Dr William Jiang — “Unlocking the Building Pipeline in a Housing Crisis: Data Mining South Australia’s Planning Approval Processes” — recipient of the Best Paper Award, 48th AUBEA International Conference. Used with permission.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a property development feasibility study actually include?

At minimum it should cover site and planning analysis under the Planning & Design Code, a full development cost stack, revenue grounded in market evidence, and the resulting residual land value and development margin — plus risk and sensitivity testing. We deliver all of this with transparent, auditable assumptions so you can see exactly how the result was reached.

What does a bad or superficial feasibility typically miss?

The common failures are an unrealistic planning pathway or yield, a cost stack that omits holding costs, finance, statutory contributions or headworks, end values based on a single optimistic rate, and no sensitivity testing. Any one of these can turn a project that looks profitable on paper into a loss — which is exactly what our process is designed to catch.

Are you a builder or developer? What does client-side mean?

Cyberate PM is a client-side development management and advisory firm. Our group carries developer-grade capability — planners, architects, engineers and a building company — but on your project we sit on your side only: in-house and external options go through the same open comparison, you see the numbers, and our fee comes from you alone. That is what keeps the analysis independent.

Do you offer a fixed-price feasibility report?

Yes — we offer productised, fixed-price reports for owners who want a fast, structured read on a site before committing to full development management. Visit our Reports page to see the available report tiers and what each one covers.

How accurate can a feasibility be this early?

A feasibility is a model, not a guarantee, and outcomes depend on assumptions that will keep evolving. Our role is to make those assumptions explicit, ground them in current SA data, and show through sensitivity testing how much the result moves when key variables change — so you understand both the base case and the range of realistic outcomes. Exact figures are always site-specific.

Start Your Project

Find out if your site stacks up

Get a fixed-price feasibility report for a fast, structured read on your site, or book a consultation to talk through your project with a client-side development manager. Either way, you'll know where the numbers really stand before you commit.

Book a Free ConsultationView Development Reports

Where to next

Development Approval

Feasibility says yes? The next question is the pathway.

Development Decision Reports

Six reports, one decision chain — and anything unverified says so.

Talk It Through

Send the address and the idea — we answer before you spend.